On 2024-10-03 23:32, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:16:31 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:@@ -283,8 +290,13 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p) "RCU not watching for tracepoint"); \ } \ } \ - __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \ - PARAMS(cond)) \ + static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \ + { \ + if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \ + __DO_TRACE(name, \ + TP_ARGS(args), \ + TP_CONDITION(cond), 1); \ + } \ static inline int \ register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \ { \Looking at this part of your change, I realized it's time to nuke the rcuidle() variant. Feel free to rebase on top of this patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241003173051.6b178bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I will. But you realize that you could have done all this SRCU and rcuidle nuking on top of my own series rather than pull the rug under my feet and require me to re-do this series again ? Grumpily, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. https://www.efficios.com
