On 9/20/24 9:06 PM, Wander Lairson Costa wrote:
From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander.lairson@xxxxxxxxx>
The function __bpf_ringbuf_reserve is invoked from a tracepoint, which
disables preemption. Using spinlock_t in this context can lead to a
"sleep in atomic" warning in the RT variant. This issue is illustrated
in the example below:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 556208, name: test_progs
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffd33a5c88ea44>] migrate_enable+0xc0/0x39c
CPU: 7 PID: 556208 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G
Hardware name: Qualcomm SA8775P Ride (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xac/0x130
show_stack+0x1c/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe8
dump_stack+0x18/0x30
__might_resched+0x3bc/0x4fc
rt_spin_lock+0x8c/0x1a4
__bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0xc4/0x254
bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr+0x5c/0xdc
bpf_prog_ac3d15160d62622a_test_read_write+0x104/0x238
trace_call_bpf+0x238/0x774
perf_call_bpf_enter.isra.0+0x104/0x194
perf_syscall_enter+0x2f8/0x510
trace_sys_enter+0x39c/0x564
syscall_trace_enter+0x220/0x3c0
do_el0_svc+0x138/0x1dc
el0_svc+0x54/0x130
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150
el0t_64_sync+0x17c/0x180
Switch the spinlock to raw_spinlock_t to avoid this error.
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander.lairson@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Brian Grech <bgrech@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it")
Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fix is for bpf tree, lgtm:
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
