On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 04:41:04PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> When running "xdp-bench tx eno0" to test the XDP_TX feature of ENETC
> on LS1028A, it was found that if the command was re-run multiple times,
> Rx could not receive the frames, and the result of xdo-bench showed
> that the rx rate was 0.
>
> root@ls1028ardb:~# ./xdp-bench tx eno0
> Hairpinning (XDP_TX) packets on eno0 (ifindex 3; driver fsl_enetc)
> Summary 2046 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
> Summary 0 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
> Summary 0 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
> Summary 0 rx/s 0 err,drop/s
>
> By observing the Rx PIR and CIR registers, we found that CIR is always
> equal to 0x7FF and PIR is always 0x7FE, which means that the Rx ring
> is full and can no longer accommodate other Rx frames. Therefore, it
> is obvious that the RX BD ring has not been cleaned up.
>
> Further analysis of the code revealed that the Rx BD ring will only
> be cleaned if the "cleaned_cnt > xdp_tx_in_flight" condition is met.
> Therefore, some debug logs were added to the driver and the current
> values of cleaned_cnt and xdp_tx_in_flight were printed when the Rx
> BD ring was full. The logs are as follows.
>
> [ 178.762419] [XDP TX] >> cleaned_cnt:1728, xdp_tx_in_flight:2140
> [ 178.771387] [XDP TX] >> cleaned_cnt:1941, xdp_tx_in_flight:2110
> [ 178.776058] [XDP TX] >> cleaned_cnt:1792, xdp_tx_in_flight:2110
>
> From the results, we can see that the maximum value of xdp_tx_in_flight
> has reached 2140. However, the size of the Rx BD ring is only 2048. This
> is incredible, so checked the code again and found that the driver did
> not reset xdp_tx_in_flight when installing or uninstalling bpf program,
> resulting in xdp_tx_in_flight still retaining the value after the last
> command was run.
>
> Fixes: c33bfaf91c4c ("net: enetc: set up XDP program under enetc_reconfigure()")
This does not explain why enetc_recycle_xdp_tx_buff(), which decreases
xdp_tx_in_flight, does not get called?
In patch 2/3 you wrote:
| Tx BD rings are disabled first in enetc_stop() and then
| wait for empty. This operation is not safe while the Tx BD ring
| is actively transmitting frames, and will cause the ring to not
| be empty and hardware exception. As described in the block guide
| of LS1028A NETC, software should only disable an active ring after
| all pending ring entries have been consumed (i.e. when PI = CI).
| Disabling a transmit ring that is actively processing BDs risks
| a HW-SW race hazard whereby a hardware resource becomes assigned
| to work on one or more ring entries only to have those entries be
| removed due to the ring becoming disabled. So the correct behavior
| is that the software stops putting frames on the Tx BD rings (this
| is what ENETC_TX_DOWN does), then waits for the Tx BD rings to be
| empty, and finally disables the Tx BD rings.
I'm surprised that after fixing that, this change would still be needed,
rather than xdp_tx_in_flight naturally dropping down to 0 when stopping
NAPI. Why doesn't that happen, and what happens to the pending XDP_TX
buffers?
