On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 4:51 PM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09/09, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > > Similarly to how we SRCU-protect uprobe instance (and avoid refcounting > > it unnecessarily) when waiting for return probe hit, use hprobe approach > > to do the same with single-stepped uprobe. Same hprobe_* primitives are > > used. We also reuse ri_timer() callback to expire both pending > > single-step uprobe and return instances. > > Well, I still think it would be better (and much simpler) to simply kill > utask->active_uprobe, iirc I even sent the RFC patch... > let's do it, please send non-RFC patches and get them landed! > Oleg. >
