On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 6:52 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 7:26 AM Andrii Nakryiko > <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:38 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF depends on CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL, which in turn > > > selects CONFIG_BPF. > > > > > > When CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y, CONFIG_BPF=y is always met. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > > > > Masahiro, > > > > Are you planning to take this through your tree, or you'd prefer us > > routing it through bpf-next? > > Hi, > > If possible, could you apply it to bpf-next > for the upcoming MW? Sure thing. We'll do.