Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: Support __nullable argument suffix for tp_btf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/10/24 8:37 PM, Philo Lu wrote:
Pointers passed to tp_btf were trusted to be valid, but some tracepoints
do take NULL pointer as input, such as trace_tcp_send_reset(). Then the
invalid memory access cannot be detected by verifier.

This patch fix it by add a suffix "__nullable" to the unreliable
argument. The suffix is shown in btf, and PTR_MAYBE_NULL will be added
to nullable arguments. Then users must check the pointer before use it.

A problem here is that we use "btf_trace_##call" to search func_proto.
As it is a typedef, argument names as well as the suffix are not
recorded. To solve this, I use bpf_raw_event_map to find
"__bpf_trace##template" from "btf_trace_##call", and then we can see the
suffix.

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  kernel/bpf/btf.c      |  9 +++++++++
  kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 1e29281653c62..d1ea38d08f301 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -6385,6 +6385,12 @@ static bool prog_args_trusted(const struct bpf_prog *prog)
  	}
  }
+static bool prog_arg_maybe_null(const struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct btf *btf,

The "prog" arg is not used, so the following nit...


+				const struct btf_param *arg)
+{
+	return btf_param_match_suffix(btf, arg, "__nullable");
+}
+
  int btf_ctx_arg_offset(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *func_proto,
  		       u32 arg_no)
  {
@@ -6554,6 +6560,9 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
  	if (prog_args_trusted(prog))
  		info->reg_type |= PTR_TRUSTED;
+ if (prog_arg_maybe_null(prog, btf, &args[arg]))

... I changed it to directly use
btf_param_match_suffix(btf, &args[arg], "__nullable"),

and removed the new prog_arg_maybe_null(). There are already a few is_kfunc_arg_{nullable, ...} helpers in verifier.c. Maybe we can consider refactoring them (if) there are more use cases like this in the future.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux