We get this with GCC 15 -O3 (at least):
```
libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’:
libbpf.c:1109:18: error: ‘mod_btf’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
1109 | kern_btf = mod_btf ? mod_btf->btf : obj->btf_vmlinux;
| ~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libbpf.c:1094:28: note: ‘mod_btf’ was declared here
1094 | struct module_btf *mod_btf;
| ^~~~~~~
In function ‘find_struct_ops_kern_types’,
inlined from ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’ at libbpf.c:1102:8:
libbpf.c:982:21: error: ‘btf’ may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
982 | kern_type = btf__type_by_id(btf, kern_type_id);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
libbpf.c: In function ‘bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops’:
libbpf.c:967:21: note: ‘btf’ was declared here
967 | struct btf *btf;
| ^~~
```
This is similar to the other libbpf fix from a few weeks ago for
the same modelling-errno issue (fab45b962749184e1a1a57c7c583782b78fad539).
Link: https://bugs.gentoo.org/939106
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index a3be6f8fac09e..7315120574c29 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ find_struct_ops_kern_types(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *tname_raw,
{
const struct btf_type *kern_type, *kern_vtype;
const struct btf_member *kern_data_member;
- struct btf *btf;
+ struct btf *btf = NULL;
__s32 kern_vtype_id, kern_type_id;
char tname[256];
__u32 i;
@@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ static int bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops(struct bpf_map *map)
const struct btf *btf = obj->btf;
struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
const struct btf *kern_btf;
- struct module_btf *mod_btf;
+ struct module_btf *mod_btf = NULL;
void *data, *kern_data;
const char *tname;
int err;
--
2.46.0
