> On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 19:01:42 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > In particular, the cpumap kthread pinned on cpu 'n' can schedule the > > backlog NAPI associated to cpu 'n'. However according to my understanding > > it seems the backlog NAPI APIs (in process_backlog()) do not support GRO, > > right? Am I missing something? > > I meant to use the struct directly, not to schedule it. All you need > is GRO - feed it packets, flush it. ack, thx for pointing this out. > But maybe you can avoid the netdev allocation and patch 3 in other ways. > Using backlog NAPI was just the first thing that came to mind. ack, I will look into it. Regards, Lorenzo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
