Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] selftests/bpf: Enable test_bpf_syscall_macro:syscall_arg1 on s390 and arm64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 9:17 PM Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Considering that CO-RE direct read access to the first system call
> argument is already available on s390 and arm64, let's enable
> test_bpf_syscall_macro:syscall_arg1 on these architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c | 4 ----
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c         | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c
> index 2900c5e9a016..1750c29b94f8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_syscall_macro.c
> @@ -38,11 +38,7 @@ void test_bpf_syscall_macro(void)
>         /* check whether args of syscall are copied correctly */
>         prctl(exp_arg1, exp_arg2, exp_arg3, exp_arg4, exp_arg5);
>
> -#if defined(__aarch64__) || defined(__s390__)
> -       ASSERT_NEQ(skel->bss->arg1, exp_arg1, "syscall_arg1");
> -#else
>         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg1, exp_arg1, "syscall_arg1");
> -#endif
>         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg2, exp_arg2, "syscall_arg2");
>         ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->arg3, exp_arg3, "syscall_arg3");
>         /* it cannot copy arg4 when uses PT_REGS_PARM4 on x86_64 */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c
> index 1a476d8ed354..9e7d9674ce2a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_syscall_macro.c
> @@ -43,9 +43,7 @@ int BPF_KPROBE(handle_sys_prctl)
>
>         /* test for PT_REGS_PARM */
>
> -#if !defined(bpf_target_arm64) && !defined(bpf_target_s390)
>         bpf_probe_read_kernel(&tmp, sizeof(tmp), &PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(real_regs));
> -#endif
>         arg1 = tmp;

There is no point in having tmp variable now, I cleaned that up as well


>         bpf_probe_read_kernel(&arg2, sizeof(arg2), &PT_REGS_PARM2_SYSCALL(real_regs));
>         bpf_probe_read_kernel(&arg3, sizeof(arg3), &PT_REGS_PARM3_SYSCALL(real_regs));
> --
> 2.34.1
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux