On 8/31/2024 12:19 PM, Pu Lehui wrote:
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
Currently PT_REGS_PARM1 SYSCALL(x) is consistent with PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE
SYSCALL(x), which will introduce the overhead of BPF_CORE_READ(), taking
into account the read pt_regs comes directly from the context, let's use
CO-RE direct read to access the first system call argument.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
index e7d9382efeb3..051c408e6aed 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ struct pt_regs___s390 {
struct pt_regs___arm64 {
unsigned long orig_x0;
-};
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
/* arm64 provides struct user_pt_regs instead of struct pt_regs to userspace */
#define __PT_REGS_CAST(x) ((const struct user_pt_regs *)(x))
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ struct pt_regs___arm64 {
#define __PT_PARM4_SYSCALL_REG __PT_PARM4_REG
#define __PT_PARM5_SYSCALL_REG __PT_PARM5_REG
#define __PT_PARM6_SYSCALL_REG __PT_PARM6_REG
-#define PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(x) PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(x)
+#define PT_REGS_PARM1_SYSCALL(x) (((const struct pt_regs___arm64 *)(x))->orig_x0)
#define PT_REGS_PARM1_CORE_SYSCALL(x) \
BPF_CORE_READ((const struct pt_regs___arm64 *)(x), __PT_PARM1_SYSCALL_REG)
Cool!
Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
