Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: add check for invalid name in btf_name_valid_section()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 3:43 AM Jeongjun Park <aha310510@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If the length of the name string is 1 and the value of name[0] is NULL
> byte, an OOB vulnerability occurs in btf_name_valid_section() and the
> return value is true, so the invalid name passes the check.
>
> To solve this, you need to check if the first position is NULL byte.
>
> Fixes: bd70a8fb7ca4 ("bpf: Allow all printable characters in BTF DATASEC names")
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 520f49f422fe..5c24ea1a65a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ static bool btf_name_valid_section(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
>         const char *src = btf_str_by_offset(btf, offset);
>         const char *src_limit;
>
> +       if (!*src)
> +               return false;
> +

We've talked about it. Quote:
"Pls add a selftest that demonstrates the issue
and produce a patch to fix just that."

length == 1 and name[0] = 0 is a hypothesis.
Demonstrate that such a scenario is possible then this patch will be
worth applying.

pw-bot: cr





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux