On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 02:25:27PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 3:58 AM Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:47:56PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 2:25 AM Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Track target endianness in 'struct bpf_gen' and process in-memory data in
> > > > native byte-order, but on finalization convert the embedded loader BPF
> > > > insns to target endianness.
> > > >
> > > > The light skeleton also includes a target-accessed data blob which is
> > > > heterogeneous and thus difficult to convert to target byte-order on
> > > > finalization. Add support functions to convert data to target endianness
> > > > as it is added to the blob.
> > > >
> > > > Also add additional debug logging for data blob structure details and
> > > > skeleton loading.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > tools/lib/bpf/bpf_gen_internal.h | 1 +
> > > > tools/lib/bpf/gen_loader.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 +
> > > > tools/lib/bpf/skel_internal.h | 3 +-
> > > > 4 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
[...]
> > > > + move_tgt_endian(attr.func_info_rec_size, load_attr->func_info_rec_size);
> > > > + move_tgt_endian(attr.func_info_cnt, load_attr->func_info_cnt);
> > >
> > > this is quite intrusive, maybe instead of imperative move_tgt_endian()
> > > macro, develop the one that could be used as
> > >
> > > attr.func_info_cnt = tgt_endian(load_attr->func_info_cnt);
> >
> > I had considered this but it's not reliable since the source var size may
> > not match the dest and the bswap will be improperly sized e.g. note above
> > that move_tgt_endian() uses the _dest_ var to size the bswap.
> >
> > While I completely agree this is intrusive, it's still safe and correct.
> > The other idea I played with is to leave the assignments alone and fix up
> > struct fields' endianness afterwards via macro. Something like:
> >
> > attr.map_type = map_type;
> > attr.key_size = key_size;
> > attr.value_size = value_size;
> > attr.map_flags = map_attr->map_flags;
> > attr.map_extra = map_attr->map_extra;
> >
> > BSWAP_FIELDS(attr, map_type, key_size, value_size, map_flags, map_extra);
> >
> > But this would require some funky macro magic, possibly in a small header.
> > What do you think? Does something similar exist already in kernel sources?
>
> do we intentionally have mismatched assignments? If not, I'd still go
> with the cleaner casting-like approach. And even if we have one or few
> intentional cases, we can just explicitly cast
Yes, I recall some implicit casts in there. I'll try to trap them with the
current macro and make them explicit, then change the imperative macro as
suggested. However, if things break in the future then debugging it
could be a pain...
>
> > >
> > > ? I.e., working as an expression, taking into account the need to swap
> > > and byte size of the argument. Should be doable.
> > >
> > > > + func_info = add_data(gen, load_attr->func_info, func_info_tot_sz);
> > > > + pr_debug("gen: prog_load: func_info: off %d cnt %d rec size %d\n",
> > > > + func_info, load_attr->func_info_cnt,
> > > > + load_attr->func_info_rec_size);
> > >
> > > [...]
