Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: test for malformed BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relocation

[Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:51 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > I don't see why we can't extend the bpf_prog_load() API to allow to
> > > specify those. (would allow to avoid open-coding this whole bpf_attr
> > > business, but it's fine as is as well)
> >
> > Maybe extend API as a followup?
> > The test won't change much, just options instead of bpf_attr.
>
> yep, follow up is good, thanks

I don't think we want this extension to bpf_prog_load() libbpf api.
This is internal gen_loader use.