> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 1:34 AM
> To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: ast@xxxxxxxxxx; bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; hawk@xxxxxxxxxx; jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx;
> john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; leon@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Long Li
> <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx;
> pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; Paul Rosswurm <paulros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> shradhagupta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx; wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mana: Fix race of mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe and
> new hwc response
>
> Le 21/08/2024 à 22:42, Haiyang Zhang a écrit :
> > The mana_hwc_rx_event_handler() / mana_hwc_handle_resp() calls
> > complete(&ctx->comp_event) before posting the wqe back. It's
> > possible that other callers, like mana_create_txq(), start the
> > next round of mana_hwc_send_request() before the posting of wqe.
> > And if the HW is fast enough to respond, it can hit no_wqe error
> > on the HW channel, then the response message is lost. The mana
> > driver may fail to create queues and open, because of waiting for
> > the HW response and timed out.
> > Sample dmesg:
> > [ 528.610840] mana 39d4:00:02.0: HWC: Request timed out!
> > [ 528.614452] mana 39d4:00:02.0: Failed to send mana message: -110, 0x0
> > [ 528.618326] mana 39d4:00:02.0 enP14804s2: Failed to create WQ object:
> -110
> >
> > To fix it, move posting of rx wqe before complete(&ctx->comp_event).
> >
> > Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fixes: ca9c54d2d6a5 ("net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure
> Network Adapter (MANA)")
> > Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz-
> 0li6OtcxBFHby3iVrkZq2A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c | 62 ++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> > index cafded2f9382..a00f915c5188 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/hw_channel.c
> > @@ -52,9 +52,33 @@ static int mana_hwc_verify_resp_msg(const struct
> hwc_caller_ctx *caller_ctx,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int mana_hwc_post_rx_wqe(const struct hwc_wq *hwc_rxq,
> > + struct hwc_work_request *req)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = hwc_rxq->hwc->dev;
> > + struct gdma_sge *sge;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + sge = &req->sge;
> > + sge->address = (u64)req->buf_sge_addr;
> > + sge->mem_key = hwc_rxq->msg_buf->gpa_mkey;
> > + sge->size = req->buf_len;
> > +
> > + memset(&req->wqe_req, 0, sizeof(struct gdma_wqe_request));
> > + req->wqe_req.sgl = sge;
> > + req->wqe_req.num_sge = 1;
> > + req->wqe_req.client_data_unit = 0;
>
> Hi,
>
> unrelated to your patch, but this initialization is useless, it is
> already memset(0)'ed a few lines above.
> So why client_data_unit and not some other fields?
Agreed. This patch just moves the function for the bug fix.
We will do code cleanups in other patches.
Thanks,
- Haiyang
