Attribute used by LLVM implementation of the feature had been changed from no_caller_saved_registers to bpf_fastcall (see [1]). This commit replaces references to nocsr by references to bpf_fastcall to keep LLVM and selftests parts in sync. [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105417 Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx> --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 4 +-- ...rifier_nocsr.c => verifier_bpf_fastcall.c} | 26 +++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{verifier_nocsr.c => verifier_bpf_fastcall.c} (95%) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c index cf3662dbd24f..80a90c627182 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ #include "verifier_movsx.skel.h" #include "verifier_netfilter_ctx.skel.h" #include "verifier_netfilter_retcode.skel.h" -#include "verifier_nocsr.skel.h" +#include "verifier_bpf_fastcall.skel.h" #include "verifier_or_jmp32_k.skel.h" #include "verifier_precision.skel.h" #include "verifier_prevent_map_lookup.skel.h" @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ void test_verifier_meta_access(void) { RUN(verifier_meta_access); } void test_verifier_movsx(void) { RUN(verifier_movsx); } void test_verifier_netfilter_ctx(void) { RUN(verifier_netfilter_ctx); } void test_verifier_netfilter_retcode(void) { RUN(verifier_netfilter_retcode); } -void test_verifier_nocsr(void) { RUN(verifier_nocsr); } +void test_verifier_bpf_fastcall(void) { RUN(verifier_bpf_fastcall); } void test_verifier_or_jmp32_k(void) { RUN(verifier_or_jmp32_k); } void test_verifier_precision(void) { RUN(verifier_precision); } void test_verifier_prevent_map_lookup(void) { RUN(verifier_prevent_map_lookup); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c similarity index 95% rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c index 666c736d196f..e30ab9fe5096 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_nocsr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bpf_fastcall.c @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ __naked void simple(void) : __clobber_all); } -/* The logic for detecting and verifying nocsr pattern is the same for +/* The logic for detecting and verifying bpf_fastcall pattern is the same for * any arch, however x86 differs from arm64 or riscv64 in a way * bpf_get_smp_processor_id is rewritten: * - on x86 it is done by verifier @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ __naked void simple(void) * * It is really desirable to check instruction indexes in the xlated * patterns, so add this canary test to check that function rewrite by - * jit is correctly processed by nocsr logic, keep the rest of the + * jit is correctly processed by bpf_fastcall logic, keep the rest of the * tests as x86. */ SEC("raw_tp") @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ __naked static void bad_write_in_subprog_aux(void) { asm volatile ( "r0 = 1;" - "*(u64 *)(r1 - 0) = r0;" /* invalidates nocsr contract for caller: */ + "*(u64 *)(r1 - 0) = r0;" /* invalidates bpf_fastcall contract for caller: */ "exit;" /* caller stack at -8 used outside of the pattern */ ::: __clobber_all); } @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ __naked void bad_helper_write(void) { asm volatile ( "r1 = 1;" - /* nocsr pattern with stack offset -8 */ + /* bpf_fastcall pattern with stack offset -8 */ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;" "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];" "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);" @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ __naked void bad_helper_write(void) "r1 += -8;" "r2 = 1;" "r3 = 42;" - /* read dst is fp[-8], thus nocsr rewrite not applied */ + /* read dst is fp[-8], thus bpf_fastcall rewrite not applied */ "call %[bpf_probe_read_kernel];" "exit;" : @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ __arch_x86_64 __log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 8") __xlated("2: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") __success -__naked void helper_call_does_not_prevent_nocsr(void) +__naked void helper_call_does_not_prevent_bpf_fastcall(void) { asm volatile ( "r1 = 1;" @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ __naked int bpf_loop_interaction1(void) { asm volatile ( "r1 = 1;" - /* nocsr stack region at -16, but could be removed */ + /* bpf_fastcall stack region at -16, but could be removed */ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;" "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];" "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);" @@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ __naked int bpf_loop_interaction2(void) { asm volatile ( "r1 = 42;" - /* nocsr stack region at -16, cannot be removed */ + /* bpf_fastcall stack region at -16, cannot be removed */ "*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r1;" "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];" "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);" @@ -759,8 +759,8 @@ __msg("stack depth 512+0") __xlated("r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") __success /* cumulative_stack_depth() stack usage is MAX_BPF_STACK, - * called subprogram uses an additional slot for nocsr spill/fill, - * since nocsr spill/fill could be removed the program still fits + * called subprogram uses an additional slot for bpf_fastcall spill/fill, + * since bpf_fastcall spill/fill could be removed the program still fits * in MAX_BPF_STACK and should be accepted. */ __naked int cumulative_stack_depth(void) @@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ __xlated("3: r0 = &(void __percpu *)(r0)") __xlated("4: r0 = *(u32 *)(r0 +0)") __xlated("5: exit") __success -__naked int nocsr_max_stack_ok(void) +__naked int bpf_fastcall_max_stack_ok(void) { asm volatile( "r1 = 42;" @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ __arch_x86_64 __log_level(4) __msg("stack depth 520") __failure -__naked int nocsr_max_stack_fail(void) +__naked int bpf_fastcall_max_stack_fail(void) { asm volatile( "r1 = 42;" @@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ __naked int nocsr_max_stack_fail(void) "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]) = r1;" "call %[bpf_get_smp_processor_id];" "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]);" - /* call to prandom blocks nocsr rewrite */ + /* call to prandom blocks bpf_fastcall rewrite */ "*(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]) = r1;" "call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];" "r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - %[max_bpf_stack_8]);" -- 2.45.2
