Re: [Potential Spoof] [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: add bpf_link__disconnect() API to preserve underlying BPF resource

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 02:50:39PM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> There are cases in which BPF resource (program, map, etc) has to outlive
> userspace program that "installed" it in the system in the first place.
> When BPF program is attached, libbpf returns bpf_link object, which
> is supposed to be destroyed after no longer necessary through
> bpf_link__destroy() API. Currently, bpf_link destruction causes both automatic
> detachment and frees up any resources allocated to for bpf_link in-memory
> representation. This is inconvenient for the case described above because of
> coupling of detachment and resource freeing.
> 
> This patch introduces bpf_link__disconnect() API call, which marks bpf_link as
> disconnected from its underlying BPF resouces. This means that when bpf_link
> is destroyed later, all its memory resources will be freed, but BPF resource
> itself won't be detached.
> 
> This design allows to follow strict and resource-leak-free design by default,
> while giving easy and straightforward way for user code to opt for keeping BPF
> resource attached beyond lifetime of a bpf_link. For some BPF programs (i.e.,
> FS-based tracepoints, kprobes, raw tracepoint, etc), user has to make sure to
> pin BPF program to prevent kernel to automatically detach it on process exit.
> This should typically be achived by pinning BPF program (or map in some cases)
> in BPF FS.
Thanks for the patch.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux