On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 9:16 PM Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le 21/08/2024 à 13:23, Soma Nakata a écrit : > > `tname` is returned by `btf__name_by_offset()` as well as `var_name`, > > and these addresses point to strings in the btf. Since their locations > > may change while loading the bpf program, using `strdup()` ensures > > `tname` is safely stored. > > > > Signed-off-by: Soma Nakata <soma.nakata01@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 7 +++++-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > index a3be6f8fac09..f4ad1b993ec5 100644 > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > > @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ struct bpf_program { > > }; > > > > struct bpf_struct_ops { > > - const char *tname; > > + char *tname; > > const struct btf_type *type; > > struct bpf_program **progs; > > __u32 *kern_func_off; > > @@ -1423,7 +1423,9 @@ static int init_struct_ops_maps(struct bpf_object *obj, const char *sec_name, > > memcpy(st_ops->data, > > data->d_buf + vsi->offset, > > type->size); > > - st_ops->tname = tname; > > + st_ops->tname = strdup(tname); > > + if (!st_ops->tname) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > Certainly a matter of taste, but I would personally move it just after > "st_ops->kern_func_off = malloc()" and add the NULL check with the > existing ones. > > BTW, there are some memory leaks if 1 or more allocations fail in this > function. > Not sure if it is an issue or not, and what should be done in this case. You mean the line below? if (!st_ops->data || !st_ops->progs || !st_ops->kern_func_off) seems it says the size of them are in descending order or something. But regardless, this looks like a memory leak. I will send another patch on this. thanks, > > CJ > > > > st_ops->type = type; > > st_ops->type_id = type_id; > > > > @@ -8984,6 +8986,7 @@ static void bpf_map__destroy(struct bpf_map *map) > > map->mmaped = NULL; > > > > if (map->st_ops) { > > + zfree(&map->st_ops->tname); > > zfree(&map->st_ops->data); > > zfree(&map->st_ops->progs); > > zfree(&map->st_ops->kern_func_off); >