On 2024/08/17 0:43, KP Singh wrote: > # v13 to v14 > > * Dropped Patch 5 based on the ongoing discussion in > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20240629084331.3807368-4-kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx/, BPF > LSM will still have default callbacks enabled. Why not use struct lsm_callback { struct list_head list; struct static_call_key key; } for each callback given that the latency is mostly caused by use of indirect function call? Then, we don't need "lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time" (which I'm NACKing). > * Dropped Patch 4 as recommended by Paul, indirect calls will remain in some LSM hooks for now. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-security-module/20240629084331.3807368-5-kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx/ > * Fixed minor nits in Patch 3
