On Thu, 2024-08-15 at 15:14 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: [...] > It is already special with a different flavor of regex. And I assume > we won't have that many jit-testing tests, so yeah, could be adjusted, > if necessary. But just in general, while __msg() works with large > verifier logs, __jit() is much more narrow-focused, so even if it > behaves differently from __msg() I don't really see much difference. > > But we also have __xlated() with similar semantics, so I'd say we > should keep __jit() and __xlated() behaving similarly. Ok, makes sense.
