On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 13:04, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:39:53 +0100
> Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 at 12:11, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 11:53:52 +0100
> > > Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > $ sudo ./xdp_redirect_cpu --dev enp134s0f0 --cpu 22 xdp_cpu_map0
> > > >
> > > > Running XDP/eBPF prog_name:xdp_cpu_map5_lb_hash_ip_pairs
> > > > XDP-cpumap CPU:to pps drop-pps extra-info
> > > > XDP-RX 20 7723038 0 0
> > > > XDP-RX total 7723038 0
> > > > cpumap_kthread total 0 0 0
> > > > redirect_err total 0 0
> > > > xdp_exception total 0 0
> > >
> > > Hmm... I'm missing some counters on the kthread side.
> > >
> >
> > Oh? Any ideas why? I just ran the upstream sample straight off.
>
> Looks like it happened in commit: bbaf6029c49c ("samples/bpf: Convert
> XDP samples to libbpf usage") (Cc Maciej).
>
> The old bpf_load.c will auto attach the tracepoints... for and libbpf
> you have to be explicit about it.
>
> Can I ask you to also run a test with --stress-mode for
> ./xdp_redirect_cpu, to flush out any potential RCU race-conditions
> (don't provide output, this is just a robustness test).
>
Sure! Other than that, does the command line above make sense? I'm
blasting UDP packets to core 20, and the idea was to re-route them to
22.
Björn
