On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 12:32:00 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > Couple years ago folks suggested that bpf-next should be > a separate pull request to increase subsystem visibility. > Back then we rejected the idea since many networking related > changes required bpf core changes. Things are different now. > bpf kfuncs can be added independently by various subsystems, > verifier additions are mainly driven by sched-ext, > so it's time to give it a shot. It's an experiment. > If things don't work out as expected we will go back to > the old model of feeding bpf trees through net/net-next trees. Excellent, fingers crossed :)
