Re: [PATCH net 1/2] selftests: udpgro: report error when receive failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 12:19:22PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh
> > @@ -49,14 +49,15 @@ run_one() {
> >   	cfg_veth
> > -	ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${rx_args} && \
> > -		echo "ok" || \
> > -		echo "failed" &
> > +	ip netns exec "${PEER_NS}" ./udpgso_bench_rx -C 1000 -R 10 ${rx_args} &
> > +	local PID1=$!
> >   	wait_local_port_listen ${PEER_NS} 8000 udp
> >   	./udpgso_bench_tx ${tx_args}
> > -	ret=$?
> > -	wait $(jobs -p)
> > +	check_err $?
> > +	wait ${PID1}
> > +	check_err $?
> > +	[ "$ret" -eq 0 ] && echo "ok" || echo "failed"
> 
> I think that with the above, in case of a failure, every test after the
> failing one will should fail, regardless of the actual results, am I
> correct?

No, only the failed test echo "failed". The passed tests still
report "ok". The "check_err $?" in run_all function only record none 0
ret as return value.

Thanks
Hangbin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux