On Wed Aug 14 2024, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: >> >> The amount of irqs can be also controlled by irq coalescing or even >> >> using busy polling. So I'd rather keep this implementation as simple as >> >> it is now. >> > >> > That has nothing to do with what I was describing. >> >> Ok, maybe I misunderstood your suggestion. It seemed to me that adding >> the RS bit to the last frame of the burst will reduce the amount of >> raised irqs. > > You got it right, but I don't think it's related to any outer settings. > The main case here is that by doing what I proposed you get much less PCIe > traffic which in turn yields better performance. I see, makes sense. Then, let's address this in another patchset also for igc. Thanks, Kurt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
