Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the vfs-brauner tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:56:29AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/coda/inode.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   626c2be9822d ("coda: use param->file for FSCONFIG_SET_FD")

FWIW, I'm not sure that FSCONFIG_SET_FD is a good idea, seeing
that it went without a single user for 6 years and this case
does not look convincing.

Oh, well - too late for that, by 8 years or so...




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux