Re: [PATCH net-next v13 00/14] Replace page_frag with page_frag_cache for sk_page_frag()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 4:30 AM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2024/8/8 20:37, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> ...
>
> >
> > CC: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240228093013.8263-1-linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Change log:
> > V13:
> >    1. Move page_frag_test from mm/ to tools/testing/selftest/mm
> >    2. Use ptr_ring to replace ptr_pool for page_frag_test.c
> >    3. Retest based on the new testing ko, which shows a big different
> >       result than using ptr_pool.
>
> Hi, Davem & Jakub & Paolo
>     It seems the state of this patchset is changed to 'Deferred' in the
> patchwork, as the info regarding the state in 'Documentation/process/
> maintainer-netdev.rst':
>
> Deferred           patch needs to be reposted later, usually due to dependency
>                    or because it was posted for a closed tree
>
> Obviously it was not the a closed tree reason here, I guess it was the dependency
> reason casuing the 'Deferred' here? I am not sure if I understand what sort of
> dependency this patchset is running into? It would be good to mention what need
> to be done avoid the kind of dependency too.
>
>
> Hi, Alexander
>     The v13 mainly address your comments about the page_fage_test module.
> It seems the your main comment about this patchset is about the new API
> naming now, and it seems there was no feedback in previous version for
> about a week:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca6be29e-ab53-4673-9624-90d41616a154@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> If there is still disagreement about the new API naming or other things, it
> would be good to continue the discussion, so that we can have better
> understanding of each other's main concern and better idea might come up too,
> like the discussion about new layout for 'struct page_frag_cache' and the
> new refactoring in patch 8.

Sorry for not getting to this sooner. I have been travelling for the
last week and a half. I just got home on Sunday and I am suffering
from a pretty bad bout of jet lag as I am overcoming a 12.5 hour time
change. The earliest I can probably get to this for review would be
tomorrow morning (8/14 in the AM PDT) as my calendar has me fully
booked with meetings most of today.

Thanks,

- Alex





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux