Re: [PATCH v2] uprobes: make trace_uprobe->nhit counter a per-CPU one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/09, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> @@ -815,13 +824,21 @@ static int probes_profile_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  {
>  	struct dyn_event *ev = v;
>  	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
> +	unsigned long nhits;
> +	int cpu;
>
>  	if (!is_trace_uprobe(ev))
>  		return 0;
>
>  	tu = to_trace_uprobe(ev);
> +
> +	nhits = 0;
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		nhits += READ_ONCE(*per_cpu_ptr(tu->nhits, cpu));

why not

		nhits += per_cpu(*tu->nhits, cpu);

?

See for example per_cpu_sum() or nr_processes(), per_cpu() should work just fine...

Other than that

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux