A selftest is added such that without the previous patch, a crash can happen. With the previous patch, the test can run successfully. The new test is written in a way which mimics original crash case: main_prog static_prog_1 static_prog_2 where static_prog_1 has different paths to static_prog_2 and some path has stack allocated and some other path does not. A stacksafe() checking in static_prog_2() triggered the crash. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c index 16bdc3e25591..8d3b75147617 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/iters.c @@ -1432,4 +1432,58 @@ int iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count(const void *ctx) return sum; } +__u32 upper, select_n, result; +__u64 global; + +static __noinline bool nest_2(char *str, int len) +{ + /* some insns (including branch insns) to ensure stacksafe() is triggered + * in nest_2(). This way, stacksafe() can compare frame associated with nest_1(). + */ + if (str[0] == 't') + return true; + if (str[1] == 'e') + return true; + if (str[2] == 's') + return true; + if (str[3] == 't') + return true; + return false; +} + +static __noinline bool nest_1(int n) +{ + /* case 0: allocate stack, case 1: no allocate stack */ + switch (n) { + case 0: { + char comm[16]; + + if (bpf_get_current_comm(comm, 16)) + return false; + return nest_2(comm, 16); + } + case 1: + return nest_2((char *)&global, sizeof(global)); + default: + return false; + } +} + +SEC("raw_tp") +__success +int iter_subprog_check_stacksafe(const void *ctx) +{ + long i; + + bpf_for(i, 0, upper) { + if (!nest_1(select_n)) { + result = 1; + return 0; + } + } + + result = 2; + return 0; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- 2.43.5