On 08/08/2024 22.44, Daniel Xu wrote:
Hi Lorenzo,
On Thu, Aug 8, 2024, at 12:54 AM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, at 12:47 PM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
[...]
AFAICT the cpumap + GRO is a good standalone improvement. I think
cpumap is still missing this.
I have a production use case for this now. We want to do some intelligent
RX steering and I think GRO would help over list-ified receive in some cases.
We would prefer steer in HW (and thus get existing GRO support) but not all
our NICs support it. So we need a software fallback.
I want to state that Cloudflare is also planning to use cpumap in
production, and (one) blocker is that CPUMAP doesn't support GRO.
Are you still interested in merging the cpumap + GRO patches?
Hi Daniel and Alex,
Recently I worked on a PoC to add GRO support to cpumap codebase:
-
https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/bpf-next/commit/a4b8264d5000ecf016da5a2dd9ac302deaf38b3e
Here I added GRO support to cpumap through gro-cells.
-
https://github.com/LorenzoBianconi/bpf-next/commit/da6cb32a4674aa72401c7414c9a8a0775ef41a55
Here I added GRO support to cpumap trough napi-threaded APIs (with a
some
changes to them).
Cool!
Please note I have not run any performance tests so far, just verified it does
not crash (I was planning to resume this work soon). Please let me know if it
works for you.
I’ll try to run an A/B test on your two approaches as well as Alex’s. I’ve still
got some testbeds with production traffic going thru them.
It is awesome that both Olek and you are stepping up for testing this.
(I'm currently too busy on cgroup rstat lock related work, but more
people will be joining my team this month and I hope they have interest
in contributing to this effort).
--Jesper
