Re: [PATCH 39/39] deal with the last remaing boolean uses of fd_file()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/39] deal with the last remaing boolean uses of fd_file()
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 12:48:14 +0200
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240730051625.14349-39-viro@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 01:16:25AM GMT, viro@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> [one added in fs/stat.c]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
  - From: Al Viro
- [PATCH 01/39] memcg_write_event_control(): fix a user-triggerable oops
  - From: viro
- [PATCH 39/39] deal with the last remaing boolean uses of fd_file()
  - From: viro

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 37/39] memcg_write_event_control(): switch to CLASS(fd)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCHSET][RFC] struct fd and memory safety
Previous by thread: [PATCH 39/39] deal with the last remaing boolean uses of fd_file()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/39] memcg_write_event_control(): fix a user-triggerable oops
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux