Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/6] selftests/bpf: Monitor traffic for tc_redirect.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2024-07-30 at 09:33 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/30/24 02:43, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-07-29 at 17:27 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> > > Enable traffic monitoring for the test case tc_redirect.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c    | 48
> > > ++++++++++++++---
> > > --
> > >   1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
> > > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
> > > index 327d51f59142..46d397c5c79a 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_redirect.c
> > > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
> > >   		__FILE__, __LINE__, strerror(errno),
> > > ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > >   
> > >   static const char * const namespaces[] = {NS_SRC, NS_FWD,
> > > NS_DST,
> > > NULL};
> > > +static struct netns_obj *netns_objs[3];
> > >   
> > >   static int write_file(const char *path, const char *newval)
> > >   {
> > > @@ -85,29 +86,52 @@ static int write_file(const char *path, const
> > > char *newval)
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > >   
> > > -static int netns_setup_namespaces(const char *verb)
> > > +enum NETNS_VERB {
> > > +	NETNS_ADD,
> > > +	NETNS_DEL,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int netns_setup_namespaces(enum NETNS_VERB verb)
> > >   {
> > >   	const char * const *ns = namespaces;
> > > -	char cmd[128];
> > > +	struct netns_obj **ns_obj = netns_objs;
> > >   
> > >   	while (*ns) {
> > > -		snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ip netns %s %s",
> > > verb,
> > > *ns);
> > > -		if (!ASSERT_OK(system(cmd), cmd))
> > > -			return -1;
> > > +		if (verb == NETNS_ADD) {
> > 
> > Maybe better to keep "verb" parameter as "char *", and use
> > 
> > 		if (!strcmp(verb, "add"))
> > 
> > here instead?
> 
> I have no strong opinion here.
> May I know why you think string is better here?

I don't mean that string is better, I mean that "keep using strings" is
better. If we continue to use string, test_tc_redirect_peer_l3 and
test_tc_redirect_run_tests can remain unchanged, it at least makes this
patch smaller.

> 
> > 
> > > +			*ns_obj = netns_new(*ns, false);
> > > +			if (!*ns_obj) {
> > > +				log_err("netns_new failed");
> > > +				return -1;
> > > +			}
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			if (!*ns_obj) {
> > > +				log_err("netns_obj is NULL");
> > > +				return -1;
> > > +			}
> > > +			netns_free(*ns_obj);
> > > +			*ns_obj = NULL;
> > > +		}
> > >   		ns++;
> > > +		ns_obj++;
> > >   	}
> > >   	return 0;
> > >   }
> > >   
> > > -static void netns_setup_namespaces_nofail(const char *verb)
> > > +static void netns_setup_namespaces_nofail(enum NETNS_VERB verb)
> > >   {
> > >   	const char * const *ns = namespaces;
> > > -	char cmd[128];
> > > +	struct netns_obj **ns_obj = netns_objs;
> > >   
> > >   	while (*ns) {
> > > -		snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "ip netns %s %s >
> > > /dev/null 2>&1", verb, *ns);
> > > -		system(cmd);
> > > +		if (verb == NETNS_ADD) {
> > > +			*ns_obj = netns_new(*ns, false);
> > > +		} else {
> > > +			if (*ns_obj)
> > > +				netns_free(*ns_obj);
> > > +			*ns_obj = NULL;
> > > +		}
> > >   		ns++;
> > > +		ns_obj++;
> > >   	}
> > >   }
> > >   
> > > @@ -1250,17 +1274,17 @@ static void
> > > test_tc_redirect_peer_l3(struct
> > > netns_setup_result *setup_result)
> > >   	({
> > >                          \
> > >   		struct netns_setup_result setup_result = {
> > > .dev_mode
> > > = mode, };             \
> > >   		if
> > > (test__start_subtest(#name))
> > >      \
> > > -			if
> > > (ASSERT_OK(netns_setup_namespaces("add"),
> > > "setup namespaces")) { \
> > > +			if
> > > (ASSERT_OK(netns_setup_namespaces(NETNS_ADD), "setup
> > > namespaces")) {
> > > \
> > >   				if
> > > (ASSERT_OK(netns_setup_links_and_routes(&setup_result),  \
> > >   					      "setup links and
> > > routes"))                    \
> > >   					test_ ##
> > > name(&setup_result);                       \
> > > -
> > > 				netns_setup_namespaces("delete")
> > > ;                           \
> > > +				netns_setup_namespaces(NETNS_DEL
> > > );
> > >                          \
> > >   			}
> > >                          \
> > >   	})
> > >   
> > >   static void *test_tc_redirect_run_tests(void *arg)
> > >   {
> > > -	netns_setup_namespaces_nofail("delete");
> > > +	netns_setup_namespaces_nofail(NETNS_DEL);
> > >   
> > >   	RUN_TEST(tc_redirect_peer, MODE_VETH);
> > >   	RUN_TEST(tc_redirect_peer, MODE_NETKIT);
> > 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux