Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the bpf-next tree

[Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 2:50 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
>   76ea8f9e0003 ("selftests/bpf: Workaround strict bpf_lsm return value check.")
>
> Fixes tag
>
>   Fixes: af980eb89f06 ("bpf, lsm: Add check for BPF LSM return value")
>
> has these problem(s):
>
>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
>
> Maybe you meant
>
> Fixes: 5d99e198be27 ("bpf, lsm: Add check for BPF LSM return value")

Yes, you are right, I missed updating the sha during bpf-next rebase.
Thanks for the heads up, I just updated and force-pushed the
bpf-next/for-next tag.

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell