Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/3] introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:56:01AM GMT, Matt Bobrowski wrote:
> G'day!
> 
> The original cover letter providing background context and motivating
> factors around the needs for these new VFS related BPF kfuncs
> introduced within this patch series can be found here [0]. Please do
> reference that if needed.
> 
> The changes contained within this version of the patch series mainly
> came at the back of discussions held with Christian at LSFMMBPF
> recently. In summary, the primary difference within this patch series
> when compared to the last [1] is that I've reduced the number of VFS
> related BPF kfuncs being introduced, housed them under fs/, and added
> more selftests.

I have no complaints about this now that it's been boiled down.
So as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to pick this up. (I also wouldn't
mind follow-up patches that move the xattr bpf kfuncs under fs/ as
well.)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux