In prog_tests/test_global_maps_resize.c, we test various use cases for
resizing global maps. Commit 7244100e0389 ("libbpf: Don't take direct
pointers into BTF data from st_ops") updated libbpf to not store pointers
to volatile BTF data, which for some users, was causing a UAF when resizing
a datasec array.
Let's ensure we have coverage for resizing datasec arrays with struct_ops
progs by also including a struct_ops map and struct_ops prog in the
test_global_map_resize skeleton. The map is automatically loaded, so we
don't need to do anything other than add it to the BPF prog being tested
to get the coverage.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_map_resize.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_map_resize.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_map_resize.c
index 1fbb73d3e5d5..714b29c7f8b2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_map_resize.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_map_resize.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
#include "vmlinux.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
@@ -60,3 +61,18 @@ int data_array_sum(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+
+SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
+int BPF_PROG(test_1)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+struct bpf_testmod_ops {
+ int (*test_1)(void);
+};
+
+SEC(".struct_ops.link")
+struct bpf_testmod_ops st_ops_resize = {
+ .test_1 = (void *)test_1
+};
--
2.45.2
