On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 12:08:25PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote: > Cong Wang wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:09:59PM +0200, Vincent Whitchurch wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:47 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:00 PM Vincent Whitchurch > > > > <vincent.whitchurch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > With a socket in the sockmap, if there's a parser callback installed > > > > > and the verdict callback returns SK_PASS, the kernel deadlocks > > > > > immediately after the verdict callback is run. This started at commit > > > > > 6648e613226e18897231ab5e42ffc29e63fa3365 ("bpf, skmsg: Fix NULL > > > > > pointer dereference in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue"). > > > > > > > > > > It can be reproduced by running ./test_sockmap -t ping > > > > > --txmsg_pass_skb. The --txmsg_pass_skb command to test_sockmap is > > > > > available in this series: > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240606-sockmap-splice-v1-0-4820a2ab14b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/. > > > > > > > > I don't have time right now to look into this issue carefully until > > > > this weekend. BTW, did you mean the patch [2/5] in the link that can > > > > solve the problem? > > > > > > No. That patch set addresses a different problem which occurs even if > > > only a verdict callback is used. But patch 4/5 in that patch set adds > > > the --txmsg_pass_skb option to the test_sockmap test program, and that > > > option can be used to reproduce this deadlock too. > > > > I think we can remove that write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock). Can you > > test the following patch? > > > > ------------> > > > > diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c > > index fd20aae30be2..da64ded97f3a 100644 > > --- a/net/core/skmsg.c > > +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c > > @@ -1116,9 +1116,7 @@ static void sk_psock_strp_data_ready(struct sock *sk) > > if (tls_sw_has_ctx_rx(sk)) { > > psock->saved_data_ready(sk); > > } else { > > - write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > > strp_data_ready(&psock->strp); > > - write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock); > > } > > } > > rcu_read_unlock(); > > Its not obvious to me that we can run the strp parser without the > sk_callback lock here. I believe below is the correct fix. It > fixes the splat above with test. The lock is still there, but just read lock. And I don't see any writing to psock->strp in strp_data_ready(), so using read lock makes sense to me. Thanks.