Hi all,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:26:29 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2024 11:33:50 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 51781ce8f448 ("riscv: Pass patch_text() the length in bytes")
> >
> > from the risc-v tree and commit:
> >
> > 9f1e16fb1fc9 ("riscv, bpf: Fix out-of-bounds issue when preparing trampoline image")
> >
> > from the bpf-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> >
> > diff --cc arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > index 7a34e5b44fc4,351e1484205e..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
> > @@@ -16,7 -16,8 +16,9 @@@
> > #include "bpf_jit.h"
> >
> > #define RV_FENTRY_NINSNS 2
> > +#define RV_FENTRY_NBYTES (RV_FENTRY_NINSNS * 4)
> > + /* imm that allows emit_imm to emit max count insns */
> > + #define RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM 0x7FFF7FF7FF7FF7FF
> >
> > #define RV_REG_TCC RV_REG_A6
> > #define RV_REG_TCC_SAVED RV_REG_S6 /* Store A6 in S6 if program do calls */
>
> This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and the net-next tree.
And now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp9OwDQ9TFQo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
