On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 7:15 PM KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:41 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2024 KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > A static key guards whether an LSM static call is enabled or not, > > > without this static key, for LSM hooks that return an int, the presence > > > of the hook that returns a default value can create side-effects which > > > has resulted in bugs [1]. > > > > I don't want to rehash our previous discussions on this topic, but I do > > think we either need to simply delete the paragraph above or update it > > to indicate that all known side effects involving LSM callback return > > values have been addressed. Removal is likely easier if for no other > > reason than we don't have to go back and forth with edits, but I can > > Agreed, we can just delete this paragraph. Thanks! Okay, I'll do that. I'll send another note when it is merged into lsm/dev, but as I said earlier, that is likely a few weeks out. This will likely end up in lsm/dev-staging before that for testing, etc. -- paul-moore.com
