Re: [PATCH bpf-next v11 2/9] selftests/bpf: Add ASSERT_OK_FD macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/9/24 2:16 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Add a new dedicated ASSERT macro ASSERT_OK_FD to test whether a socket
FD is valid or not. It can be used to replace macros ASSERT_GT(fd, 0, ""),
ASSERT_NEQ(fd, -1, "") or statements (fd < 0), (fd != -1).

Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 8 ++++++++
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
index 0ba5a20b19ba..4f7b91c25b1e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
@@ -377,6 +377,14 @@ int test__join_cgroup(const char *path);
  	___ok;								\
  })
+#define ASSERT_OK_FD(fd, name) ({ \
+	static int duration = 0;					\
+	int ___fd = (fd);						\
+	bool ___ok = ___fd >= 0;					\
+	CHECK(!___ok, (name), "unexpected fd: %d\n", ___fd);		\

printing errno should be useful.

+	___ok;								\
+})
+
  #define SYS(goto_label, fmt, ...)					\
  	({								\
  		char cmd[1024];						\





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux