On 2024-07-09 at 03:44:14, Tony Nguyen (anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> {
> u16 reg_idx = q_vector->reg_idx;
> struct ice_pf *pf = vsi->back;
> struct ice_hw *hw = &pf->hw;
> - struct ice_tx_ring *tx_ring;
> - struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring;
> + int q, _qid = qid;
>
> ice_cfg_itr(hw, q_vector);
>
> - ice_for_each_tx_ring(tx_ring, q_vector->tx)
> - ice_cfg_txq_interrupt(vsi, tx_ring->reg_idx, reg_idx,
> - q_vector->tx.itr_idx);
> + for (q = 0; q < q_vector->num_ring_tx; q++) {
> + ice_cfg_txq_interrupt(vsi, _qid, reg_idx, q_vector->tx.itr_idx);
> + _qid++;
> + }
nit: why we need a new variable just for "for" loop ? qid + q wont suffice ?
>
