Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpftool: improve skeleton backwards compat with old buggy libbpfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 12:21 PM Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04/07/2024 01:15, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Old versions of libbpf don't handle varying sizes of bpf_map_skeleton
> > struct correctly. As such, BPF skeleton generated by newest bpftool
> > might not be compatible with older libbpf (though only when libbpf is
> > used as a shared library), even though it, by design, should.
> >
> > Going forward libbpf will be fixed, plus we'll release bug fixed
> > versions of relevant old libbpfs, but meanwhile try to mitigate from
> > bpftool side by conservatively assuming older and smaller definition of
> > bpf_map_skeleton, if possible. Meaning, if there are no struct_ops maps.
> >
> > If there are struct_ops, then presumably user would like to have
> > auto-attaching logic and struct_ops map link placeholders, so use the
> > full bpf_map_skeleton definition in that case.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@xxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Note: I don't know to what extent we enforce this, but kernel docs state
> that "Since Co-developed-by: denotes authorship, every Co-developed-by:
> must be immediately followed by a Signed-off-by: of the associated
> co-author". Mykyta's sign-off is missing from both patches.
>

Oh, sorry about that. I don't do co-developed-by often, so didn't
realize. I'll add Mykyta's Signed-off-by in v2, thanks

> Other than that, the patch looks good, thanks for fixing bpftool!
>
> Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <qmo@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux