Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 15:13:17 +0200
Cc: andrii@xxxxxxxxxx, ast@xxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx, haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx, hawk@xxxxxxxxxx, john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx, jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patchwork-bot@xxxxxxxxxx, sdf@xxxxxxxxxxx, song@xxxxxxxxxx, syzkaller-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yonghong.song@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <000000000000767898061c8e30e8@google.com>

#syz fix: tun: Assign missing bpf_net_context.
#syz test: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git main

Sebastian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
  - From: syzbot

References:
- [syzbot] [net?] [bpf?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
  - From: syzbot
- Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
  - From: syzbot

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "bpf: Take return from set_memory_rox() into account with bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro()" for linux-6.6.37
Next by Date: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
Previous by thread: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
Next by thread: Re: [syzbot] [bpf?] [net?] general protection fault in dev_map_redirect
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux