[PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Use max() instead of max_t()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use max() instead of max_t(). The types are already compatible and don't
need to be cast to u32 using max_t().

Compile-tested only.

Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index 976cb258a0ed..f0a4f5c06b10 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr,
 
 	nbuckets = roundup_pow_of_two(num_possible_cpus());
 	/* Use at least 2 buckets, select_bucket() is undefined behavior with 1 bucket */
-	nbuckets = max_t(u32, 2, nbuckets);
+	nbuckets = max(2, nbuckets);
 	smap->bucket_log = ilog2(nbuckets);
 
 	smap->buckets = bpf_map_kvcalloc(&smap->map, sizeof(*smap->buckets),
-- 
2.45.2





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux