On Fri, Jul 5, 2024 at 8:17 PM Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Let's take this one step at a time. I think patches 1-4 are fine and > stand alone and solve a specific problem without creating any new > immediate problems. > > After 1-4 is accepted, we can come back around to what patch 5 is trying > to do, and work on whatever issues may remain at that time. Kees, whatever technical review you may have for any proposed patches is always welcome, and if you want to provide process advice, solicited or otherwise, to people posting patches that is up to you. However, after your last comments regarding the management of the LSM tree, I want to make it clear that I'm not interested in your opinions on what should be merged into the LSM tree at this point in time. -- paul-moore.com
