On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 01:36:19PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > Yes, please use struct_size_t(). This is exactly what it was designed for. Kees, please, just let up, not going to happen. I'm getting really fed up having to endlessly repeat what a piece of shite struct_size() is. Put your time and effort into doing a proper language extension so we can go and delete all that __builtin_*_overflow() based garbage.
