Re: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v2 0/3] Use bpf_prog_pack for RV64 bpf trampoline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 03:04:34 +0000 you wrote:
> We used bpf_prog_pack to aggregate bpf programs into huge page to
> relieve the iTLB pressure on the system. We can apply it to bpf
> trampoline, as Song had been implemented it in core and x86 [0]. This
> patch is going to use bpf_prog_pack to RV64 bpf trampoline. Since Song
> and Puranjay have done a lot of work for bpf_prog_pack on RV64,
> implementing this function will be easy. But one thing to mention is
> that emit_call in RV64 will generate the maximum number of instructions
> during dry run, but during real patching it may be optimized to 1
> instruction due to distance. This is no problem as it does not overflow
> the allocated RO image.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [RESEND,bpf-next,v2,1/3] bpf: Use precise image size for struct_ops trampoline
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d1a426171d76
  - [RESEND,bpf-next,v2,2/3] riscv, bpf: Fix out-of-bounds issue when preparing trampoline image
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/9f1e16fb1fc9
  - [RESEND,bpf-next,v2,3/3] riscv, bpf: Use bpf_prog_pack for RV64 bpf trampoline
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2382a405c581

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux