On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:25 PM Geliang Tang <geliang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > v2: > - add patch 2, a new fix for sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter. > - update patch 3, only test "sk->sk_prot->close" as Eric suggested. > - update patch 4, use "goto err" instead of "return" as Eduard > suggested. > - add "fixes" tag for patch 1-3. > - change subject prefixes as "bpf-next" to trigger BPF CI. > - cc Loongarch maintainers too. > > BPF selftests seem to have not been fully tested on Loongarch. When I > ran these tests on Loongarch recently, some errors occur. This patch set > contains some null-check related fixes for these errors. Is the root cause that LoongArch lacks bpf trampoline? Huacai > > Geliang Tang (4): > skmsg: null check for sg_page in sk_msg_recvmsg > skmsg: null check for sg_page in sk_msg_memcopy_from_iter > inet: null check for close in inet_release > selftests/bpf: Null checks for link in bpf_tcp_ca > > net/core/skmsg.c | 4 ++++ > net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 3 ++- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.43.0 >
