Re: [PATCH] bpf, btf: Make if test explicit to fix Coccinelle error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:56 PM Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Explicitly test the iterator variable i > 0 to fix the following
> Coccinelle/coccicheck error reported by itnull.cocci:
>
>         ERROR: iterator variable bound on line 4688 cannot be NULL
>
> Compile-tested only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 821063660d9f..7720f8967814 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -4687,7 +4687,7 @@ static void btf_datasec_show(const struct btf *btf,
>                             __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off));
>         for_each_vsi(i, t, vsi) {
>                 var = btf_type_by_id(btf, vsi->type);
> -               if (i)
> +               if (i > 0)
>                         btf_show(show, ",");

Sorry, I don't think this is a sustainable approach.
We cannot fix such things all over the kernel.
Pls make cocci smarter instead.

pw-bot: cr





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux