On 06/20, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > Can we instead ask loongarch folks to rewrite it to be a constant? > Having this as a function call is both an inconvenience and potential > performance problem (a minor one, but still). I would imagine it's not > hard to hard-code an instruction as a constant here. I was going to ask the same question when I saw the bug report ;) The same for other users of larch_insn_gen_break(). But I can't understand what does it do, it calls emit_break() and git grep -w emit_break finds nothing. Oleg.
