On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:02:28 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There may be following resolutions: > > Oh gawd, sodding weak functions again. > > I would suggest changing scipts/kallsyms.c to emit readily identifiable > symbol names for all the weak junk, eg: > > __weak_junk_NNNNN > > That instantly fixes the immediate problem and Steve's horrid hack can > go away. Right. And when I wrote that hack, I specifically said this should be fixed in kallsyms, and preferably at build time, as that's when the weak functions should all be resolved. -- Steve > > Additionally, I would add a boot up pass that would INT3 fill all such > functions and remove/invalidate all > static_call/static_jump/fentry/alternative entry that is inside of them.
