[PATCH v5 net-next 11/15] lwt: Don't disable migration prio invoking BPF.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is no need to explicitly disable migration if bottom halves are
also disabled. Disabling BH implies disabling migration.

Remove migrate_disable() and rely solely on disabling BH to remain on
the same CPU.

Cc: bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/core/lwt_bpf.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
index 4a0797f0a154b..a94943681e5aa 100644
--- a/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
+++ b/net/core/lwt_bpf.c
@@ -40,10 +40,9 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	/* Migration disable and BH disable are needed to protect per-cpu
-	 * redirect_info between BPF prog and skb_do_redirect().
+	/* Disabling BH is needed to protect per-CPU bpf_redirect_info between
+	 * BPF prog and skb_do_redirect().
 	 */
-	migrate_disable();
 	local_bh_disable();
 	bpf_compute_data_pointers(skb);
 	ret = bpf_prog_run_save_cb(lwt->prog, skb);
@@ -78,7 +77,6 @@ static int run_lwt_bpf(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bpf_lwt_prog *lwt,
 	}
 
 	local_bh_enable();
-	migrate_enable();
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.45.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux