Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/11] bpf, lsm: Annotate lsm hook return value range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 8:24 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add macro LSM_RET_INT to annotate lsm hook return integer type and the
> default return value, and the expected return range.
>
> The LSM_RET_INT is declared as:
>
> LSM_RET_INT(defval, min, max)
>
> where
>
> - defval is the default return value
>
> - min and max indicate the expected return range is [min, max]
>
> The return value range for each lsm hook is taken from the description
> in security/security.c.
>
> The expanded result of LSM_RET_INT is not changed, and the compiled
> product is not changed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 591 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h     |   6 -
>  kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c          |  10 +
>  security/security.c           |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 313 insertions(+), 295 deletions(-)

...

> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> index 334e00efbde4..708f515ffbf3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h
> @@ -18,435 +18,448 @@
>   * The macro LSM_HOOK is used to define the data structures required by
>   * the LSM framework using the pattern:
>   *
> - *     LSM_HOOK(<return_type>, <default_value>, <hook_name>, args...)
> + *     LSM_HOOK(<return_type>, <return_description>, <hook_name>, args...)
>   *
>   * struct security_hook_heads {
> - *   #define LSM_HOOK(RET, DEFAULT, NAME, ...) struct hlist_head NAME;
> + *   #define LSM_HOOK(RET, RETVAL_DESC, NAME, ...) struct hlist_head NAME;
>   *   #include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
>   *   #undef LSM_HOOK
>   * };
>   */
> -LSM_HOOK(int, 0, binder_set_context_mgr, const struct cred *mgr)
> -LSM_HOOK(int, 0, binder_transaction, const struct cred *from,
> +LSM_HOOK(int, LSM_RET_INT(0, -MAX_ERRNO, 0), binder_set_context_mgr, const struct cred *mgr)
> +LSM_HOOK(int, LSM_RET_INT(0, -MAX_ERRNO, 0), binder_transaction, const struct cred *from,
>          const struct cred *to)
> -LSM_HOOK(int, 0, binder_transfer_binder, const struct cred *from,
> +LSM_HOOK(int, LSM_RET_INT(0, -MAX_ERRNO, 0), binder_transfer_binder, const struct cred *from,
>          const struct cred *to)
> -LSM_HOOK(int, 0, binder_transfer_file, const struct cred *from,
> +LSM_HOOK(int, LSM_RET_INT(0, -MAX_ERRNO, 0), binder_transfer_file, const struct cred *from,
>          const struct cred *to, const struct file *file)

I'm not overly excited about injecting these additional return value
range annotations into the LSM hook definitions, especially since the
vast majority of the hooks "returns 0 on success, negative values on
error".  I'd rather see some effort put into looking at the
feasibility of converting some (all?) of the LSM hook return value
exceptions into the more conventional 0/-ERRNO format.  Unfortunately,
I haven't had the time to look into that myself, but if you wanted to
do that I think it would be a good thing.

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux